QUESTION: Mathew 16:28 seems to say that some of the
people around Jesus would not die until he comes again. Can you explain this to
me?
ANSWER: Thanks, this is an oft asked question, and it
is also asked about another time that Jesus seems to say to his hearers that
they will live to see his second coming – in his Olivet Discourse, in Matt
24:34-35 when he says that “This generation will certainly not pass away until
all these things take place.”
In both places it’s fairly easy to reconcile these
statements with what actually happened, rather than assume that Jesus made a
terrible error in promising his second coming within the lifetime of his
disciples, when that clearly did not happen.
Let’s start with Matt 16:28: “I assure you: There are some
standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in
His kingdom.” This does seem to indicate
his second coming on first pass, and all the more so because the preceding
verse directly references his second coming.
But in the parallel passage in Mark 9:1, we get an
additional detail that gives us reason to believe Jesus is not referring to his
second coming when he says: ‘I assure
you: There are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the
kingdom of God come in power.’
Note here it’s phrased, Kingdom of God coming, in
Power. So the event is here in Mark described
as a more general revealing of kingdom power, and less specifically the coming
of Jesus at the end of time. But Matthew
did refer to the coming of the Son of Man, so this powerful revealing must be
about Jesus in some way, even if it’s not THE coming, at the end of time.
We can find a way to fuse the two accounts when we consider the
context. Remember, in both gospels what
precedes this promise is Peter’s stubborn refusal to accept Jesus prediction of
his demotion and execution (Mark 8:32).
This doesn’t jive with Peter’s view of an exalted and conquering
Messiah. How can Jesus be the true Messiah
of Jewish prophesy, if he surrenders to humiliation and death?
So, Jesus is giving assurance that Peter, while wrong about
the immediate fate of Messiah, is in fact right about him as exalted and
powerful Son of Man (as expected in Daniel’s vision). To reassure him, he says, “make no mistake, I
am that exalted and powerful Messiah of Prophesy and in fact I will reveal that
power to some in this circle before they die.”
You won’t have to wait for some ethereal heaven to see me clothed in
power, Jesus says, you’ll see it in this life.
Seen this way, it is not a promise relating to his second
coming, but simply a promise to see the power of his Kingly, Divine nature, coming
to them before they die. In fact, one
might say he is expressly promising to “come in power” BEFORE his second
coming. You won’t have to wait till the
end or till after death, he’s saying, you’ll see it soon.
 |
| Transfiguration of Christ |
The fulfillment of that promise then, comes immediately
within a week of hearing it, for Jesus takes “some” of them up on a mountain
and he is transfigured before them (Mark 9:2 & Matt 17:2) in power and
light. If they wondered if the humble
Jesus, who predicted he was going to die a criminal’s death, could still be the
long awaited, powerful and worshiped “Son of Man” of Daniel’s vision, the
experience on the mount would have cleared it up! The Son of Man did indeed come ‘in power’ and
they saw it – not his second coming, but a coming in power all the same. Jesus was who they expected after all, but also
so much more.
Regarding Matt 24:34-35 when he says that “This generation
will certainly not pass away until all these things take place”, we realize his
promise is for his current hearers when we realize that “all these things”
doesn't refer solely or even primarily to the end times and his 2nd
coming but rather to the Temple destruction.
We know this because the entire discourse was started with
the disciples admiring the beautiful 2nd Temple. Jesus responded by saying it would be
destroyed and they immediately want to know when that would happen. They further ask about the sign of the end
and his 2nd coming. They tied the two together not doubt assuming
that an apocalyptic event such as the Temple’s destruction must presage the very
end and Messiah’s restoration.
So the discussion covers the Temple’s destruction and ranges
into the signs of the end, but it BEGINS as an answer to that first question,
“when will the destruction of the Temple happen?” If that is true, then the statement in vs 34 about
“this generation” is not only accurate but powerfully prophetic! In fact, the Temple was destroyed before
“that generation had passed away” for it happened in 70 AD, within the lifetimes
of eye witnesses to Jesus.
As for Jesus including “ALL these things,” the two events (Temple
destruction and 2nd Coming) are likely conflated in the minds of the
disciples and Jesus doesn't counter this association. Why not if the events are separated by 2000
years and counting? Well, the terrors leading
up to the coming of the Son of Man were in some sense inaugurated by the destruction
of the Temple. That event marked the
beginning of the “last days”. One might assume
Jesus was saying, “This generation will still be alive when all these signs
begin to come to pass.”
There is however another way to explain this passage and the
NIVR translation resolves the conflict by rendering the Greek as follows: “What I'm about to tell you is true. The
people living at that time will certainly not pass away until all those things
have happened. (Matthew 24:34 NIRV)
So the resolution may simply be that “this generation” does
not refer to the people listening to Jesus speak at all, but rather to the generation living
“at that time” when these terrible events take place.
Either way, I think there’s no reason to think Jesus was thinking only about his actual 2nd coming in either case.
No comments:
Post a Comment